Enemy of the Left

Two days ago Martha Coakley, democrat candidate for the open Massachusetts Senate seat vacated by the late Ted Kennedy did a radio interview with talk show host Ken Pittman of WBSM 1420am in Massachusetts' south coast. Pittman asked Coakley if she would pass a health care bill that included a conscientious objector provision to certain procedures, most likely abortion and/or contraceptives. She said she would not support any bill that had this provision because abortion is legal under Roe vs Wade and that health care workers "have" to full fill that law. This statement in itself is incorrect as not all medical facilities perform abortions. When Pittman pushed her on this she mentioned that her opponent Republican state senator Scott Brown did file an amendment to a Massachusetts bill giving hospitals or E.R. personnel the ability to deny "emergency" contraceptives, i.e. abortion or the "Morning after pill" based on there religious beliefs. Coakley stated that there is a "separation of church and state" which is a fantasy used by the democrats. What the Constitution actually says in the First amendment is "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof". Which means that there would be NO state sponsored religion like the church of England that was forced on people by the British government. Remember the colonists came here FOR religious freedom! The words "Separation of church and state is NOT found ANYWHERE in the Constitution, nor any of our founding documents, NONE!

Pittman challenges her by saying "in the emergency room you still have your religious freedom." After stammering from that statement she goes on to say "the law says that people are "allowed" to have that and you can have religious freedom; you shouldn't work in the emergency room."

So now Coakley, democrat, is begrudgingly confirming that the law "says" you have religious freedom, but wants to put limits or confines on that religious freedom and in doing so will tell you where to work and what to do!

A rational person would say "If a hospital or individual does not want to perform an act that puts them at odds with their religious teachings and beliefs they should have the right to deny that request to anyone. Eventhough the person seeking these services does not hold the same beliefs their rights under the law should not squash someone else's rights of religious freedom given to them under the first amendment! The person seeking such a service still has the ability to find another individual or facility that does not have those same beliefs that would restrict them under their religion." A popular satellite radio host, Andrew Wilkow has a saying and it applies here. "Your freedom to be you includes my freedom to free of you."

Instead like every other issue that liberal democrats take up, they do away with personal responsibility and choice and instead want to change everything for everyone to fit their agenda!



The Church, Abortion and War - the Real numbers

The Catholic church itself has condemned abortion since it has become legal with
the Supreme courts decision in the Roe vs Wade case in 1973 making it legal in the U.S. Since that controversial decision was made there have been 49,551,703 abortions performed in the U.S. alone according to the Guttmacher Institute and the National right to life website!! That's 49,551,703 children that never had a chance to live because of their Mother's incredibly selfish decision not to carry the baby to term and at the very least give the child the chance at life by putting it up for adoption. Now, some cases might have been rape, incest, safety of the mother or of the realization that the fetus was deformed in some way or that some other birth defect was detected that the parents didn't want to or couldn't deal with. That being said does anyone really believe that even a small number of these 49,551,703 abortions were because of rape, incest, safety of the mother or birth defects? I don't. These excuses, though some may be valid, are mostly just a way to justify this horrible, evil law!

Now let's rack up the numbers of that most "evil" tool of humanity that the liberals always condemn the U.S. for, WAR. So we know liberal's love Roe vs Wade and a women's "right" to choose and they hate, hate, hate war because of all the "Innocent" victims is creates. Let's compare the number of deaths from abortion to the number of deaths from ALL U.S. war involvement shall we?

So we already know that since 1973 when Roe vs Wade made abortion legal in the U.S. there have been 49,551,703 from 1973 to January 2010.

Now, according to Department of Defense's own data the total number of U.S. war deaths both in theater and out of theater is 1,194,144 since the inception of the nation!!!

Which amount if greater?
49,551,703
or
1,194,144

The church condemns abortion outright. If you are Catholic and follow the church's doctrine and the teachings of Jesus how could you perform such an act? Even if you are not devout, but still believe in Christ how could you? I say that you could not and that health care workers should have the right under our religious freedom to refuse to kill another human being no matter how old they are! If you believe abortion is as much a murder as any other act that involuntarily stops a human beings heart then how can any government law or official force you to become a murderer in God's eyes? God's law is more powerful, "Thou Shall Not Kill"

If you have to protect your or your families lives from another and you end up killing that person in your defense then I think that is justified. Someone trying to do evil upon you or your family has made that choice and deserves the consequences. A little unborn baby being killed inside it's Mother's womb, before it has a chance to live even one day or take it's first breath, is truly the height of evil! God has granted this little creature life and who are we as humans to deny it?

One more thing, I know some will be offended at my stance here and to that I say I'm sorry. I'm sorry that you don't see the bigger picture here. I'm sorry that you excuse evil. If you think I'm wrong and you think a women's "right to choose" to abort her baby is correct then why don't you go watch an abortion on the web? I have. Just google "abortion video", you'll find it. Then why don't you pass it around through email and post it on facebook and let all your friends celebrate your "right to choose". If Roe vs Wade was such a great, terrific court decision then I'm sure they would all love to see the video of the end result right??

If you find you can not pass this video around, if you can not stand to look at the horrible images of dismembered babies, which is part of it, then I suggest that the Roe vs Wade decision was wrong and evil. I suggest that anyone like Martha Coakley that wants to make people go against God and their religion and perform abortions on women who are either ignorant at best or evil at worst is themselves evil. And finally, if you take the position of "well, I wouldn't get an abortion, but I don't want to stop anyone else from getting one, that's their decision." This is like saying, "I wouldn't murder anyone, but I'm not going to tell someone else they can't murder someone, that's their choice." Do you see the ridiculousness of it now? If you still take that position then I say you are supporting evil and Satan directly by NOT condemning this evil act. With your inaction you are going against God!

Now you have a REAL choice to make!